Home / Compare players / Brandon Ingram vs Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 2025-26 comparison Brandon Ingram vs Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 2025-26 shot maps 7/12 (58%) 5/11 (45%) 3/4 (75%) 3/5 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 4/8 (50%) 3/5 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 2/8 (25%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 4/5 (80%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/7 (29%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 4/15 (27%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 4/7 (57%) 4/20 (20%) 3/6 (50%) 1/7 (14%) 3/3 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 2/2 (100%) 2/7 (29%) 5/8 (63%) 1/6 (17%) 2/6 (33%) 2/5 (40%) 0/3 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 3/5 (60%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 4/12 (33%) 1/5 (20%) 0/2 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 2/6 (33%) 2/4 (50%) 2/3 (67%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 0/1 (0%) 9/11 (82%) 4/4 (100%) 3/3 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 1/7 (14%) 1/1 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/6 (17%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 2/2 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 5/8 (63%) 2/5 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/6 (17%) 4/7 (57%) 7/14 (50%) 4/9 (44%) 3/8 (38%) 2/5 (40%) 3/6 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 12/18 (67%) 1/11 (9%) 9/14 (64%) 5/9 (56%) 4/11 (36%) 8/12 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 2/5 (40%) 4/8 (50%) 5/5 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 0/2 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 1/1 (100%) 82/98 (84%) 9/18 (50%) 6/17 (35%) 8/18 (44%) 4/7 (57%) 2/2 (100%) 7/11 (64%) 24/41 (59%) 5/13 (38%) 2/6 (33%) 1/6 (17%) 1/7 (14%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 12/22 (55%) 10/15 (67%) 4/11 (36%) 4/8 (50%) 4/7 (57%) 2/4 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/6 (33%) 0/5 (0%) 4/5 (80%) 2/6 (33%) 3/8 (38%) 5/7 (71%) 1/4 (25%) 1/5 (20%) 4/9 (44%) 3/6 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 4/5 (80%) 0/7 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 5/9 (56%) 6/14 (43%) 1/2 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 3/5 (60%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 2/5 (40%) 2/4 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 1/4 (25%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 5/8 (63%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/7 (29%) 3/5 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 4/6 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 2/6 (33%) 2/5 (40%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 4/6 (67%) 2/7 (29%) 2/6 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 5/8 (63%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 2/7 (29%) 4/5 (80%) 5/8 (63%) 4/4 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 3/7 (43%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/2 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 4/8 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 3/8 (38%) 2/3 (67%) 0/5 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 3/3 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 3/9 (33%) 7/7 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 1/4 (25%) Brandon Ingram 614–1288 FG1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 3/5 (60%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 3/5 (60%) 1/5 (20%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 5/14 (36%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/4 (0%) 2/5 (40%) 3/7 (43%) 1/4 (25%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 2/10 (20%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 3/6 (50%) 6/8 (75%) 2/6 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 5/12 (42%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 5/12 (42%) 5/8 (63%) 4/7 (57%) 2/4 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 4/6 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 4/9 (44%) 2/2 (100%) 3/5 (60%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/1 (100%) 3/9 (33%) 2/3 (67%) 2/8 (25%) 6/8 (75%) 1/3 (33%) 4/5 (80%) 1/2 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 0/4 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 5/7 (71%) 5/6 (83%) 7/15 (47%) 1/4 (25%) 1/2 (50%) 5/7 (71%) 2/6 (33%) 9/11 (82%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/4 (75%) 5/9 (56%) 4/8 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 6/9 (67%) 3/8 (38%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 4/5 (80%) 5/7 (71%) 6/9 (67%) 3/4 (75%) 2/5 (40%) 2/9 (22%) 3/5 (60%) 1/2 (50%) 2/3 (67%) 3/6 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 3/5 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 5/6 (83%) 33/51 (65%) 21/36 (58%) 4/6 (67%) 3/4 (75%) 2/8 (25%) 4/5 (80%) 1/2 (50%) 3/7 (43%) 0/1 (0%) 5/10 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 5/5 (100%) 70/83 (84%) 36/50 (72%) 5/12 (42%) 1/6 (17%) 3/10 (30%) 0/4 (0%) 7/13 (54%) 3/8 (38%) 0/2 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 4/5 (80%) 3/6 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 6/8 (75%) 46/64 (72%) 25/37 (68%) 1/4 (25%) 3/5 (60%) 6/8 (75%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 1/6 (17%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 9/13 (69%) 12/19 (63%) 5/11 (45%) 6/8 (75%) 1/3 (33%) 2/8 (25%) 1/7 (14%) 3/6 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/2 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 3/3 (100%) 6/15 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 5/9 (56%) 3/6 (50%) 3/8 (38%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 3/3 (100%) 9/15 (60%) 4/9 (44%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 4/8 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/5 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 1/4 (25%) 1/2 (50%) 2/2 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 1/9 (11%) 1/2 (50%) 4/5 (80%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 11/15 (73%) 1/2 (50%) 2/14 (14%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/2 (50%) 1/5 (20%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 3/5 (60%) 1/3 (33%) 3/3 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 5/10 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 731–1321 FG above typical accuracy typical below. Better percentage highlighted when both players took 10+ shots in the zone. Shot locations.
Quick answers Who scores more, Brandon Ingram or Shai Gilgeous-Alexander? Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had the higher points per game in 2025-26: 31.1, compared with 21.5 for Brandon Ingram. Who is the more efficient scorer? Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had the higher true shooting percentage in 2025-26: 66.5%, compared with 57.3% for Brandon Ingram. Who rebounds and passes more? Brandon Ingram had the higher rebounds per game in 2025-26: 5.6, compared with 4.3 for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had the higher assists per game in 2025-26: 6.6, compared with 3.7 for Brandon Ingram. Who had the higher PER? Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had the higher PER in 2025-26: 30.6, compared with 15.2 for Brandon Ingram. PER summarizes per-minute box-score production. Statistics. Better value highlighted per row. How to read these stats .