Home / Compare players / Cade Cunningham vs Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 2025-26 comparison Cade Cunningham vs Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 2025-26 shot maps 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 3/8 (38%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 4/10 (40%) 3/3 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 3/7 (43%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/5 (20%) 2/7 (29%) 0/4 (0%) 4/7 (57%) 4/13 (31%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/6 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 3/5 (60%) 3/5 (60%) 3/7 (43%) 1/16 (6%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 1/5 (20%) 3/4 (75%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 6/17 (35%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 5/7 (71%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/6 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 3/7 (43%) 3/3 (100%) 0/4 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 3/11 (27%) 3/9 (33%) 5/11 (45%) 5/11 (45%) 3/7 (43%) 3/8 (38%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 11/19 (58%) 7/23 (30%) 3/10 (30%) 2/6 (33%) 2/4 (50%) 1/6 (17%) 3/11 (27%) 19/37 (51%) 2/5 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 37/54 (69%) 41/59 (69%) 14/25 (56%) 5/10 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 5/13 (38%) 3/7 (43%) 1/1 (100%) 3/9 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 4/10 (40%) 0/2 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/4 (25%) 0/2 (0%) 29/46 (63%) 23/45 (51%) 4/8 (50%) 6/13 (46%) 2/9 (22%) 1/3 (33%) 1/5 (20%) 3/3 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 4/16 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 20/23 (87%) 13/27 (48%) 7/16 (44%) 4/4 (100%) 3/6 (50%) 3/12 (25%) 2/2 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 4/8 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 1/5 (20%) 5/6 (83%) 2/7 (29%) 2/6 (33%) 3/5 (60%) 3/8 (38%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/8 (13%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/6 (17%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 0/1 (0%) 9/16 (56%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/10 (20%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 3/10 (30%) 0/5 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 4/11 (36%) 0/5 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) Cade Cunningham 548–1189 FG1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 3/5 (60%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 3/5 (60%) 1/5 (20%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 5/14 (36%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/4 (0%) 2/5 (40%) 3/7 (43%) 1/4 (25%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 2/10 (20%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 3/6 (50%) 6/8 (75%) 2/6 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 5/12 (42%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 5/12 (42%) 5/8 (63%) 4/7 (57%) 2/4 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 4/6 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 4/9 (44%) 2/2 (100%) 3/5 (60%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/1 (100%) 3/9 (33%) 2/3 (67%) 2/8 (25%) 6/8 (75%) 1/3 (33%) 4/5 (80%) 1/2 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 0/4 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 5/7 (71%) 5/6 (83%) 7/15 (47%) 1/4 (25%) 1/2 (50%) 5/7 (71%) 2/6 (33%) 9/11 (82%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/4 (75%) 5/9 (56%) 4/8 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 6/9 (67%) 3/8 (38%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 4/5 (80%) 5/7 (71%) 6/9 (67%) 3/4 (75%) 2/5 (40%) 2/9 (22%) 3/5 (60%) 1/2 (50%) 2/3 (67%) 3/6 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 3/5 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 5/6 (83%) 33/51 (65%) 21/36 (58%) 4/6 (67%) 3/4 (75%) 2/8 (25%) 4/5 (80%) 1/2 (50%) 3/7 (43%) 0/1 (0%) 5/10 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 5/5 (100%) 70/83 (84%) 36/50 (72%) 5/12 (42%) 1/6 (17%) 3/10 (30%) 0/4 (0%) 7/13 (54%) 3/8 (38%) 0/2 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 4/5 (80%) 3/6 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 6/8 (75%) 46/64 (72%) 25/37 (68%) 1/4 (25%) 3/5 (60%) 6/8 (75%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 1/6 (17%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 9/13 (69%) 12/19 (63%) 5/11 (45%) 6/8 (75%) 1/3 (33%) 2/8 (25%) 1/7 (14%) 3/6 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/2 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 3/3 (100%) 6/15 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 5/9 (56%) 3/6 (50%) 3/8 (38%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 3/3 (100%) 9/15 (60%) 4/9 (44%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 4/8 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/5 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 1/4 (25%) 1/2 (50%) 2/2 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 1/9 (11%) 1/2 (50%) 4/5 (80%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 11/15 (73%) 1/2 (50%) 2/14 (14%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/2 (50%) 1/5 (20%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 3/5 (60%) 1/3 (33%) 3/3 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 5/10 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 731–1321 FG above typical accuracy typical below. Better percentage highlighted when both players took 10+ shots in the zone. Shot locations.
Quick answers Who scores more, Cade Cunningham or Shai Gilgeous-Alexander? Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had the higher points per game in 2025-26: 31.1, compared with 23.9 for Cade Cunningham. Who is the more efficient scorer? Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had the higher true shooting percentage in 2025-26: 66.5%, compared with 56.4% for Cade Cunningham. Who rebounds and passes more? Cade Cunningham had the higher rebounds per game in 2025-26: 5.5, compared with 4.3 for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Cade Cunningham had the higher assists per game in 2025-26: 9.9, compared with 6.6 for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Who had the higher PER? Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had the higher PER in 2025-26: 30.6, compared with 20.9 for Cade Cunningham. PER summarizes per-minute box-score production. Statistics. Better value highlighted per row. How to read these stats .