Home / Compare players / Brandon Ingram vs Paolo Banchero 2025-26 comparison Brandon Ingram vs Paolo Banchero 2025-26 shot maps 7/12 (58%) 5/11 (45%) 3/4 (75%) 3/5 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 4/8 (50%) 3/5 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 2/8 (25%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 4/5 (80%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/7 (29%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 4/15 (27%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 4/7 (57%) 4/20 (20%) 3/6 (50%) 1/7 (14%) 3/3 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 2/2 (100%) 2/7 (29%) 5/8 (63%) 1/6 (17%) 2/6 (33%) 2/5 (40%) 0/3 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 3/5 (60%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 4/12 (33%) 1/5 (20%) 0/2 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 2/6 (33%) 2/4 (50%) 2/3 (67%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 0/1 (0%) 9/11 (82%) 4/4 (100%) 3/3 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 1/7 (14%) 1/1 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/6 (17%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 2/2 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 5/8 (63%) 2/5 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/6 (17%) 4/7 (57%) 7/14 (50%) 4/9 (44%) 3/8 (38%) 2/5 (40%) 3/6 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 12/18 (67%) 1/11 (9%) 9/14 (64%) 5/9 (56%) 4/11 (36%) 8/12 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 2/5 (40%) 4/8 (50%) 5/5 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 0/2 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 1/1 (100%) 82/98 (84%) 9/18 (50%) 6/17 (35%) 8/18 (44%) 4/7 (57%) 2/2 (100%) 7/11 (64%) 24/41 (59%) 5/13 (38%) 2/6 (33%) 1/6 (17%) 1/7 (14%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 12/22 (55%) 10/15 (67%) 4/11 (36%) 4/8 (50%) 4/7 (57%) 2/4 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/6 (33%) 0/5 (0%) 4/5 (80%) 2/6 (33%) 3/8 (38%) 5/7 (71%) 1/4 (25%) 1/5 (20%) 4/9 (44%) 3/6 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 4/5 (80%) 0/7 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 5/9 (56%) 6/14 (43%) 1/2 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 3/5 (60%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 2/5 (40%) 2/4 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 1/4 (25%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 5/8 (63%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/7 (29%) 3/5 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 4/6 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 2/6 (33%) 2/5 (40%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 4/6 (67%) 2/7 (29%) 2/6 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 5/8 (63%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 2/7 (29%) 4/5 (80%) 5/8 (63%) 4/4 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 3/7 (43%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/2 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 4/8 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 3/8 (38%) 2/3 (67%) 0/5 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 3/3 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 3/9 (33%) 7/7 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 1/4 (25%) Brandon Ingram 614–1288 FG2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 2/4 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 2/6 (33%) 1/5 (20%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/7 (29%) 1/4 (25%) 0/1 (0%) 4/9 (44%) 0/4 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/10 (20%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 3/7 (43%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 3/7 (43%) 0/3 (0%) 2/9 (22%) 4/9 (44%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 2/3 (67%) 0/2 (0%) 0/4 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 2/4 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/4 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/5 (40%) 1/2 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 2/4 (50%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 4/12 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 1/3 (33%) 2/3 (67%) 2/10 (20%) 1/6 (17%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 16/25 (64%) 4/11 (36%) 1/5 (20%) 3/4 (75%) 3/4 (75%) 2/4 (50%) 23/45 (51%) 1/4 (25%) 0/4 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/5 (20%) 0/2 (0%) 80/105 (76%) 64/89 (72%) 12/28 (43%) 3/16 (19%) 3/7 (43%) 3/7 (43%) 0/6 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/11 (27%) 0/2 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 37/58 (64%) 44/72 (61%) 4/13 (31%) 7/11 (64%) 3/9 (33%) 0/5 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 12/28 (43%) 9/19 (47%) 2/7 (29%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/4 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 3/8 (38%) 0/2 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 4/9 (44%) 0/3 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 1/6 (17%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 3/12 (25%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/4 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/3 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/6 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 6/9 (67%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/6 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 3/6 (50%) 3/5 (60%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) Paolo Banchero 529–1152 FG above typical accuracy typical below. Better percentage highlighted when both players took 10+ shots in the zone. Shot locations.
Quick answers Who scores more, Brandon Ingram or Paolo Banchero? Paolo Banchero had the higher points per game in 2025-26: 22.2, compared with 21.5 for Brandon Ingram. Who is the more efficient scorer? Brandon Ingram had the higher true shooting percentage in 2025-26: 57.3%, compared with 56.6% for Paolo Banchero. Who rebounds and passes more? Paolo Banchero had the higher rebounds per game in 2025-26: 8.4, compared with 5.6 for Brandon Ingram. Paolo Banchero had the higher assists per game in 2025-26: 5.2, compared with 3.7 for Brandon Ingram. Who had the higher PER? Paolo Banchero had the higher PER in 2025-26: 16.1, compared with 15.2 for Brandon Ingram. PER summarizes per-minute box-score production. Statistics. Better value highlighted per row. How to read these stats .