Home / Compare players / Cade Cunningham vs Jalen Brunson 2025-26 comparison Cade Cunningham vs Jalen Brunson 2025-26 shot maps 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 3/8 (38%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 4/10 (40%) 3/3 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 3/7 (43%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/5 (20%) 2/7 (29%) 0/4 (0%) 4/7 (57%) 4/13 (31%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/6 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 3/5 (60%) 3/5 (60%) 3/7 (43%) 1/16 (6%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 1/5 (20%) 3/4 (75%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 6/17 (35%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 5/7 (71%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/6 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 3/7 (43%) 3/3 (100%) 0/4 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 3/11 (27%) 3/9 (33%) 5/11 (45%) 5/11 (45%) 3/7 (43%) 3/8 (38%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 11/19 (58%) 7/23 (30%) 3/10 (30%) 2/6 (33%) 2/4 (50%) 1/6 (17%) 3/11 (27%) 19/37 (51%) 2/5 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 37/54 (69%) 41/59 (69%) 14/25 (56%) 5/10 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 5/13 (38%) 3/7 (43%) 1/1 (100%) 3/9 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 4/10 (40%) 0/2 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/4 (25%) 0/2 (0%) 29/46 (63%) 23/45 (51%) 4/8 (50%) 6/13 (46%) 2/9 (22%) 1/3 (33%) 1/5 (20%) 3/3 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 4/16 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 20/23 (87%) 13/27 (48%) 7/16 (44%) 4/4 (100%) 3/6 (50%) 3/12 (25%) 2/2 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 4/8 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 1/5 (20%) 5/6 (83%) 2/7 (29%) 2/6 (33%) 3/5 (60%) 3/8 (38%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/8 (13%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/6 (17%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 0/1 (0%) 9/16 (56%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/10 (20%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 3/10 (30%) 0/5 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 4/11 (36%) 0/5 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) Cade Cunningham 548–1189 FG3/5 (60%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/5 (20%) 3/6 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/2 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/5 (20%) 0/3 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/10 (10%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 6/15 (40%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 5/10 (50%) 11/17 (65%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 3/5 (60%) 6/14 (43%) 0/3 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 5/12 (42%) 3/4 (75%) 3/5 (60%) 3/5 (60%) 3/10 (30%) 1/2 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 4/9 (44%) 2/3 (67%) 4/6 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 3/11 (27%) 0/1 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 5/13 (38%) 0/2 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 5/9 (56%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/4 (0%) 5/9 (56%) 6/12 (50%) 6/9 (67%) 3/6 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 2/5 (40%) 8/12 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 4/5 (80%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 7/17 (41%) 4/18 (22%) 5/12 (42%) 5/10 (50%) 3/8 (38%) 3/4 (75%) 1/1 (100%) 3/4 (75%) 0/2 (0%) 4/6 (67%) 2/5 (40%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 15/25 (60%) 19/36 (53%) 8/13 (62%) 7/20 (35%) 4/5 (80%) 1/2 (50%) 4/11 (36%) 2/6 (33%) 9/17 (53%) 3/8 (38%) 4/10 (40%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 37/51 (73%) 22/36 (61%) 11/22 (50%) 9/15 (60%) 9/19 (47%) 6/13 (46%) 7/13 (54%) 5/7 (71%) 0/1 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 3/8 (38%) 5/8 (63%) 3/5 (60%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 15/22 (68%) 12/22 (55%) 6/11 (55%) 9/17 (53%) 2/6 (33%) 4/10 (40%) 2/7 (29%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/5 (40%) 5/7 (71%) 1/1 (100%) 1/6 (17%) 2/2 (100%) 5/8 (63%) 2/6 (33%) 4/9 (44%) 1/4 (25%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 3/7 (43%) 1/7 (14%) 1/5 (20%) 3/5 (60%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/6 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 5/8 (63%) 3/4 (75%) 4/7 (57%) 4/5 (80%) 0/1 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 1/5 (20%) 2/3 (67%) 4/8 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 3/5 (60%) 2/6 (33%) 2/10 (20%) 3/4 (75%) 3/4 (75%) 4/6 (67%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 4/5 (80%) 1/2 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/6 (33%) 7/9 (78%) 1/4 (25%) 4/7 (57%) 5/14 (36%) 2/4 (50%) 2/5 (40%) 0/3 (0%) 3/5 (60%) 5/9 (56%) 4/5 (80%) 0/2 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 8/24 (33%) 7/14 (50%) 2/4 (50%) 0/4 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 2/9 (22%) 11/26 (42%) 1/2 (50%) 3/3 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 4/7 (57%) 7/22 (32%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 2/8 (25%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 5/16 (31%) 1/5 (20%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 5/10 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 5/9 (56%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/3 (33%) 3/7 (43%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 3/9 (33%) 8/16 (50%) 3/9 (33%) 0/3 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/2 (100%) Jalen Brunson 689–1475 FG above typical accuracy typical below. Better percentage highlighted when both players took 10+ shots in the zone. Shot locations.
Quick answers Who scores more, Cade Cunningham or Jalen Brunson? Jalen Brunson had the higher points per game in 2025-26: 26.0, compared with 23.9 for Cade Cunningham. Who is the more efficient scorer? Jalen Brunson had the higher true shooting percentage in 2025-26: 58.0%, compared with 56.4% for Cade Cunningham. Who rebounds and passes more? Cade Cunningham had the higher rebounds per game in 2025-26: 5.5, compared with 3.3 for Jalen Brunson. Cade Cunningham had the higher assists per game in 2025-26: 9.9, compared with 6.8 for Jalen Brunson. Who had the higher PER? Cade Cunningham had the higher PER in 2025-26: 20.9, compared with 19.8 for Jalen Brunson. PER summarizes per-minute box-score production. Statistics. Better value highlighted per row. How to read these stats .