whynba.
Following

Today's NBA games

All scores & games
Game times: Eastern Time.Overview follows Eastern league dates.

Some game updates are delayed. Check each game’s source time.

2025-26 comparison

Cade Cunningham vs Julius Randle

Cade CunninghamCade CunninghamDetroit Pistons · 64 GPJulius RandleJulius RandleMinnesota Timberwolves · 79 GP
Cade Cunningham vs Julius Randle · 2025-26 per-game and advanced statistics
Cade CunninghamPer gameJulius Randle
33.9Minutes33.0
23.9Points21.1
5.5Rebounds6.7
9.9Assists5.0
1.4Steals1.1
0.8Blocks0.2
3.7Turnovers2.7
46.1FG%48.1
34.23P%31.5
81.2FT%80.2
56.4True shooting %58.5
20.9PER17.5
30.6Usage %26.7
+518+/− (season)+232

2025-26 shot maps

1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)0/2 (0%)1/3 (33%)1/1 (100%)1/2 (50%)3/8 (38%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)2/4 (50%)1/2 (50%)1/1 (100%)1/4 (25%)2/4 (50%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)4/10 (40%)3/3 (100%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)3/7 (43%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)1/2 (50%)1/1 (100%)1/5 (20%)2/7 (29%)0/4 (0%)4/7 (57%)4/13 (31%)0/1 (0%)2/2 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/2 (50%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/3 (33%)3/6 (50%)1/3 (33%)0/2 (0%)3/3 (100%)1/3 (33%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)2/3 (67%)3/5 (60%)3/5 (60%)3/7 (43%)1/16 (6%)2/4 (50%)1/2 (50%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/2 (50%)1/3 (33%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)2/3 (67%)2/4 (50%)1/5 (20%)3/4 (75%)2/2 (100%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)6/17 (35%)1/2 (50%)0/2 (0%)1/2 (50%)0/2 (0%)1/2 (50%)5/7 (71%)0/1 (0%)1/4 (25%)2/6 (33%)1/3 (33%)0/1 (0%)3/7 (43%)3/3 (100%)0/4 (0%)2/3 (67%)1/2 (50%)3/11 (27%)3/9 (33%)5/11 (45%)5/11 (45%)3/7 (43%)3/8 (38%)3/3 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/2 (50%)2/4 (50%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)11/19 (58%)7/23 (30%)3/10 (30%)2/6 (33%)2/4 (50%)1/6 (17%)3/11 (27%)19/37 (51%)2/5 (40%)1/4 (25%)1/3 (33%)1/2 (50%)1/2 (50%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)37/54 (69%)41/59 (69%)14/25 (56%)5/10 (50%)3/6 (50%)1/4 (25%)5/13 (38%)3/7 (43%)1/1 (100%)3/9 (33%)1/1 (100%)4/10 (40%)0/2 (0%)3/4 (75%)1/4 (25%)0/2 (0%)29/46 (63%)23/45 (51%)4/8 (50%)6/13 (46%)2/9 (22%)1/3 (33%)1/5 (20%)3/3 (100%)2/2 (100%)4/16 (25%)1/3 (33%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)1/2 (50%)20/23 (87%)13/27 (48%)7/16 (44%)4/4 (100%)3/6 (50%)3/12 (25%)2/2 (100%)2/3 (67%)4/8 (50%)3/6 (50%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)2/5 (40%)1/5 (20%)5/6 (83%)2/7 (29%)2/6 (33%)3/5 (60%)3/8 (38%)1/2 (50%)1/2 (50%)1/1 (100%)0/3 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/8 (13%)0/3 (0%)1/2 (50%)3/4 (75%)0/2 (0%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)1/6 (17%)1/2 (50%)0/1 (0%)3/4 (75%)0/1 (0%)9/16 (56%)1/3 (33%)0/1 (0%)0/3 (0%)2/2 (100%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)2/3 (67%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)0/3 (0%)1/4 (25%)2/10 (20%)0/3 (0%)1/2 (50%)0/1 (0%)1/2 (50%)1/1 (100%)3/10 (30%)0/5 (0%)0/1 (0%)2/3 (67%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)4/11 (36%)0/5 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)2/2 (100%)0/2 (0%)1/6 (17%)0/2 (0%)1/1 (100%)2/3 (67%)1/2 (50%)2/3 (67%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/2 (50%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)1/4 (25%)
Cade Cunningham 548–1189 FG
0/1 (0%)3/5 (60%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/4 (25%)2/5 (40%)3/7 (43%)5/10 (50%)0/3 (0%)1/5 (20%)0/2 (0%)3/9 (33%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)3/6 (50%)1/3 (33%)0/2 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)1/8 (13%)2/2 (100%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)0/3 (0%)1/1 (100%)0/3 (0%)2/6 (33%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/2 (50%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)1/1 (100%)3/6 (50%)0/1 (0%)2/3 (67%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)1/2 (50%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)1/4 (25%)2/4 (50%)1/5 (20%)1/1 (100%)1/2 (50%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)1/2 (50%)2/2 (100%)0/1 (0%)2/7 (29%)0/2 (0%)1/4 (25%)2/2 (100%)2/6 (33%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)2/5 (40%)4/11 (36%)3/9 (33%)1/3 (33%)2/4 (50%)3/5 (60%)1/2 (50%)2/2 (100%)1/2 (50%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)10/20 (50%)1/8 (13%)3/5 (60%)1/6 (17%)2/6 (33%)2/5 (40%)2/6 (33%)4/6 (67%)0/3 (0%)2/5 (40%)1/3 (33%)0/2 (0%)1/1 (100%)41/56 (73%)33/62 (53%)8/17 (47%)2/11 (18%)4/9 (44%)4/5 (80%)3/5 (60%)1/8 (13%)2/5 (40%)3/4 (75%)2/7 (29%)1/1 (100%)120/150 (80%)49/79 (62%)7/13 (54%)8/13 (62%)2/8 (25%)8/12 (67%)2/5 (40%)4/5 (80%)1/1 (100%)10/14 (71%)2/6 (33%)10/18 (56%)0/1 (0%)2/6 (33%)1/2 (50%)0/2 (0%)7/16 (44%)5/13 (38%)5/10 (50%)1/4 (25%)2/4 (50%)3/4 (75%)1/2 (50%)1/5 (20%)0/2 (0%)1/4 (25%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)1/1 (100%)1/3 (33%)5/11 (45%)1/3 (33%)3/4 (75%)1/6 (17%)0/5 (0%)2/4 (50%)4/7 (57%)1/3 (33%)2/4 (50%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)0/4 (0%)2/3 (67%)2/2 (100%)0/1 (0%)3/3 (100%)2/4 (50%)0/1 (0%)3/5 (60%)1/1 (100%)1/2 (50%)1/2 (50%)2/3 (67%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)2/4 (50%)0/4 (0%)2/3 (67%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)0/3 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)1/3 (33%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)0/2 (0%)1/4 (25%)2/3 (67%)2/8 (25%)2/9 (22%)1/5 (20%)1/3 (33%)0/1 (0%)1/2 (50%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)2/2 (100%)1/2 (50%)0/1 (0%)3/9 (33%)1/3 (33%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)1/2 (50%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)2/3 (67%)0/1 (0%)2/2 (100%)0/1 (0%)2/6 (33%)1/2 (50%)2/5 (40%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)5/11 (45%)0/4 (0%)2/2 (100%)2/2 (100%)1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)3/7 (43%)1/3 (33%)1/1 (100%)0/2 (0%)3/6 (50%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)0/3 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/3 (33%)1/5 (20%)0/2 (0%)0/1 (0%)2/5 (40%)0/4 (0%)0/2 (0%)1/5 (20%)0/2 (0%)1/1 (100%)2/6 (33%)3/5 (60%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/2 (0%)1/2 (50%)1/1 (100%)
Julius Randle 580–1207 FG
Cade Cunningham vs Julius Randle · shooting accuracy by zone
Cade CunninghamZone FG% (attempts)Julius Randle
63.1% (314)Restricted area league 67.2%67.6% (395)
41.7% (333)In the paint (non-RA) league 44.5%47.2% (290)
48.9% (176)Mid-range league 41.8%38.1% (176)
38.9% (18)Corner 3 league 38.8%33.8% (77)
33.9% (348)Above the break 3 league 35.2%30.9% (269)

above typical accuracy typical below. Better percentage highlighted when both players took 10+ shots in the zone. Shot locations.

Quick answers

Who scores more, Cade Cunningham or Julius Randle?
Cade Cunningham had the higher points per game in 2025-26: 23.9, compared with 21.1 for Julius Randle.
Who is the more efficient scorer?
Julius Randle had the higher true shooting percentage in 2025-26: 58.5%, compared with 56.4% for Cade Cunningham.
Who rebounds and passes more?
Julius Randle had the higher rebounds per game in 2025-26: 6.7, compared with 5.5 for Cade Cunningham. Cade Cunningham had the higher assists per game in 2025-26: 9.9, compared with 5.0 for Julius Randle.
Who had the higher PER?
Cade Cunningham had the higher PER in 2025-26: 20.9, compared with 17.5 for Julius Randle. PER summarizes per-minute box-score production.

More comparisons

Cade Cunningham vs Luka Dončić · Cade Cunningham vs Shai Gilgeous-Alexander · Cade Cunningham vs Anthony Edwards · Cade Cunningham vs Jaylen Brown · Julius Randle vs Luka Dončić · Julius Randle vs Shai Gilgeous-Alexander · Julius Randle vs Anthony Edwards · Julius Randle vs Jaylen Brown

Statistics. Better value highlighted per row. How to read these stats.