Home / Compare players / Cade Cunningham vs Michael Porter Jr. 2025-26 comparison Cade Cunningham vs Michael Porter Jr. 2025-26 shot maps 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 3/8 (38%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 4/10 (40%) 3/3 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 3/7 (43%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/5 (20%) 2/7 (29%) 0/4 (0%) 4/7 (57%) 4/13 (31%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/6 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 3/5 (60%) 3/5 (60%) 3/7 (43%) 1/16 (6%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 1/5 (20%) 3/4 (75%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 6/17 (35%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 5/7 (71%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/6 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 3/7 (43%) 3/3 (100%) 0/4 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 3/11 (27%) 3/9 (33%) 5/11 (45%) 5/11 (45%) 3/7 (43%) 3/8 (38%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 11/19 (58%) 7/23 (30%) 3/10 (30%) 2/6 (33%) 2/4 (50%) 1/6 (17%) 3/11 (27%) 19/37 (51%) 2/5 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 37/54 (69%) 41/59 (69%) 14/25 (56%) 5/10 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 5/13 (38%) 3/7 (43%) 1/1 (100%) 3/9 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 4/10 (40%) 0/2 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/4 (25%) 0/2 (0%) 29/46 (63%) 23/45 (51%) 4/8 (50%) 6/13 (46%) 2/9 (22%) 1/3 (33%) 1/5 (20%) 3/3 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 4/16 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 20/23 (87%) 13/27 (48%) 7/16 (44%) 4/4 (100%) 3/6 (50%) 3/12 (25%) 2/2 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 4/8 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 1/5 (20%) 5/6 (83%) 2/7 (29%) 2/6 (33%) 3/5 (60%) 3/8 (38%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/8 (13%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/6 (17%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 0/1 (0%) 9/16 (56%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/10 (20%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 3/10 (30%) 0/5 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 4/11 (36%) 0/5 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) Cade Cunningham 548–1189 FG0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 2/5 (40%) 0/3 (0%) 0/5 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 3/8 (38%) 0/3 (0%) 3/7 (43%) 0/3 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 3/9 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 3/9 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 5/9 (56%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 3/11 (27%) 2/5 (40%) 2/7 (29%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 11/19 (58%) 2/3 (67%) 7/14 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 5/12 (42%) 0/3 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 3/8 (38%) 1/2 (50%) 5/7 (71%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 7/17 (41%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 4/13 (31%) 0/4 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 3/3 (100%) 3/4 (75%) 0/2 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/9 (11%) 5/7 (71%) 1/6 (17%) 0/1 (0%) 3/6 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 15/19 (79%) 3/11 (27%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 6/10 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 2/10 (20%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 62/67 (93%) 32/44 (73%) 6/13 (46%) 1/3 (33%) 5/15 (33%) 8/15 (53%) 1/4 (25%) 2/5 (40%) 2/2 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 0/5 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 26/29 (90%) 17/28 (61%) 0/3 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/14 (21%) 1/6 (17%) 1/3 (33%) 4/10 (40%) 0/2 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 6/9 (67%) 3/5 (60%) 1/4 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 0/4 (0%) 3/11 (27%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 4/12 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 2/2 (100%) 0/6 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 4/9 (44%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/7 (29%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 4/17 (24%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 2/6 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 3/5 (60%) 0/1 (0%) 5/10 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 0/1 (0%) 4/11 (36%) 1/4 (25%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 0/4 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/6 (50%) 3/5 (60%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) Michael Porter Jr. 444–958 FG above typical accuracy typical below. Better percentage highlighted when both players took 10+ shots in the zone. Shot locations.
Quick answers Who scores more, Cade Cunningham or Michael Porter Jr.? Michael Porter Jr. had the higher points per game in 2025-26: 24.2, compared with 23.9 for Cade Cunningham. Who is the more efficient scorer? Michael Porter Jr. had the higher true shooting percentage in 2025-26: 59.5%, compared with 56.4% for Cade Cunningham. Who rebounds and passes more? Michael Porter Jr. had the higher rebounds per game in 2025-26: 7.1, compared with 5.5 for Cade Cunningham. Cade Cunningham had the higher assists per game in 2025-26: 9.9, compared with 3.0 for Michael Porter Jr.. Who had the higher PER? Cade Cunningham had the higher PER in 2025-26: 20.9, compared with 18.3 for Michael Porter Jr.. PER summarizes per-minute box-score production. Statistics. Better value highlighted per row. How to read these stats .