Home / Compare players / Cade Cunningham vs Paolo Banchero 2025-26 comparison Cade Cunningham vs Paolo Banchero 2025-26 shot maps 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 3/8 (38%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 4/10 (40%) 3/3 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 3/7 (43%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 1/5 (20%) 2/7 (29%) 0/4 (0%) 4/7 (57%) 4/13 (31%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/6 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 3/5 (60%) 3/5 (60%) 3/7 (43%) 1/16 (6%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 1/5 (20%) 3/4 (75%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 6/17 (35%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 5/7 (71%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/6 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 3/7 (43%) 3/3 (100%) 0/4 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 3/11 (27%) 3/9 (33%) 5/11 (45%) 5/11 (45%) 3/7 (43%) 3/8 (38%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 11/19 (58%) 7/23 (30%) 3/10 (30%) 2/6 (33%) 2/4 (50%) 1/6 (17%) 3/11 (27%) 19/37 (51%) 2/5 (40%) 1/4 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 37/54 (69%) 41/59 (69%) 14/25 (56%) 5/10 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 5/13 (38%) 3/7 (43%) 1/1 (100%) 3/9 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 4/10 (40%) 0/2 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 1/4 (25%) 0/2 (0%) 29/46 (63%) 23/45 (51%) 4/8 (50%) 6/13 (46%) 2/9 (22%) 1/3 (33%) 1/5 (20%) 3/3 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 4/16 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 0/2 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 20/23 (87%) 13/27 (48%) 7/16 (44%) 4/4 (100%) 3/6 (50%) 3/12 (25%) 2/2 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 4/8 (50%) 3/6 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 1/5 (20%) 5/6 (83%) 2/7 (29%) 2/6 (33%) 3/5 (60%) 3/8 (38%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/8 (13%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/6 (17%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 3/4 (75%) 0/1 (0%) 9/16 (56%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/10 (20%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 3/10 (30%) 0/5 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 4/11 (36%) 0/5 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 1/2 (50%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) Cade Cunningham 548–1189 FG2/4 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 2/4 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 2/6 (33%) 1/5 (20%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 0/3 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 2/7 (29%) 1/4 (25%) 0/1 (0%) 4/9 (44%) 0/4 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 2/10 (20%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 3/7 (43%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 3/7 (43%) 0/3 (0%) 2/9 (22%) 4/9 (44%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 2/3 (67%) 0/2 (0%) 0/4 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/3 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 2/4 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/4 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/4 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/5 (40%) 1/2 (50%) 1/4 (25%) 2/4 (50%) 0/3 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 4/12 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 1/3 (33%) 2/3 (67%) 2/10 (20%) 1/6 (17%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 16/25 (64%) 4/11 (36%) 1/5 (20%) 3/4 (75%) 3/4 (75%) 2/4 (50%) 23/45 (51%) 1/4 (25%) 0/4 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/5 (20%) 0/2 (0%) 80/105 (76%) 64/89 (72%) 12/28 (43%) 3/16 (19%) 3/7 (43%) 3/7 (43%) 0/6 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 3/11 (27%) 0/2 (0%) 1/5 (20%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 37/58 (64%) 44/72 (61%) 4/13 (31%) 7/11 (64%) 3/9 (33%) 0/5 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 3/3 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 2/3 (67%) 2/4 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 2/3 (67%) 12/28 (43%) 9/19 (47%) 2/7 (29%) 2/3 (67%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) 1/4 (25%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 3/8 (38%) 0/2 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 4/9 (44%) 0/3 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 1/6 (17%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 3/12 (25%) 1/1 (100%) 1/4 (25%) 2/4 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/1 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/6 (17%) 0/1 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/4 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 0/3 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 0/6 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 6/9 (67%) 2/3 (67%) 1/1 (100%) 2/4 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%) 1/1 (100%) 2/6 (33%) 1/2 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 3/4 (75%) 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 2/5 (40%) 1/1 (100%) 0/1 (0%) 1/2 (50%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/3 (0%) 1/3 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 1/1 (100%) 3/6 (50%) 3/5 (60%) 2/2 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 1/3 (33%) Paolo Banchero 529–1152 FG above typical accuracy typical below. Better percentage highlighted when both players took 10+ shots in the zone. Shot locations.
Quick answers Who scores more, Cade Cunningham or Paolo Banchero? Cade Cunningham had the higher points per game in 2025-26: 23.9, compared with 22.2 for Paolo Banchero. Who is the more efficient scorer? Paolo Banchero had the higher true shooting percentage in 2025-26: 56.6%, compared with 56.4% for Cade Cunningham. Who rebounds and passes more? Paolo Banchero had the higher rebounds per game in 2025-26: 8.4, compared with 5.5 for Cade Cunningham. Cade Cunningham had the higher assists per game in 2025-26: 9.9, compared with 5.2 for Paolo Banchero. Who had the higher PER? Cade Cunningham had the higher PER in 2025-26: 20.9, compared with 16.1 for Paolo Banchero. PER summarizes per-minute box-score production. Statistics. Better value highlighted per row. How to read these stats .